Critical LangChain Core Vulnerability Exposes Secrets via Serialization Injection

A critical security flaw has been disclosed in LangChain Core that could be exploited by an attacker to steal sensitive secrets and even influence large language model (LLM) responses through prompt injection. LangChain Core (i.e., langchain-core) is a core Python package that’s part of the LangChain ecosystem, providing the core interfaces and model-agnostic abstractions for building
[[{“value”:”

Critical LangChain Core Vulnerability

A critical security flaw has been disclosed in LangChain Core that could be exploited by an attacker to steal sensitive secrets and even influence large language model (LLM) responses through prompt injection.

LangChain Core (i.e., langchain-core) is a core Python package that’s part of the LangChain ecosystem, providing the core interfaces and model-agnostic abstractions for building applications powered by LLMs.

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-68664, carries a CVSS score of 9.3 out of 10.0. Security researcher Yarden Porat has been credited with reporting the vulnerability on December 4, 2025. It has been codenamed LangGrinch.

“A serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain’s dumps() and dumpd() functions,” the project maintainers said in an advisory. “The functions do not escape dictionaries with ‘lc’ keys when serializing free-form dictionaries.”

Cybersecurity

“The ‘lc’ key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data.”

According to Cyata researcher Porat, the crux of the problem has to do with the two functions failing to escape user-controlled dictionaries containing “lc” keys. The “lc” marker represents LangChain objects in the framework’s internal serialization format.

“So once an attacker is able to make a LangChain orchestration loop serialize and later deserialize content including an ‘lc’ key, they would instantiate an unsafe arbitrary object, potentially triggering many attacker-friendly paths,” Porat said.

This could have various outcomes, including secret extraction from environment variables when deserialization is performed with “secrets_from_env=True” (previously set by default), instantiating classes within pre-approved trusted namespaces, such as langchain_core, langchain, and langchain_community, and potentially even leading to arbitrary code execution via Jinja2 templates.

What’s more, the escaping bug enables the injection of LangChain object structures through user-controlled fields like metadata, additional_kwargs, or response_metadata via prompt injection.

The patch released by LangChain introduces new restrictive defaults in load() and loads() by means of an allowlist parameter “allowed_objects” that allows users to specify which classes can be serialized/deserialized. In addition, Jinja2 templates are blocked by default, and the “secrets_from_env” option is now set to “False” to disable automatic secret loading from the environment.

The following versions of langchain-core are affected by CVE-2025-68664 –

  • >= 1.0.0, < 1.2.5 (Fixed in 1.2.5)
  • < 0.3.81 (Fixed in 0.3.81)

It’s worth noting that there exists a similar serialization injection flaw in LangChain.js that also stems from not properly escaping objects with “lc” keys, thereby enabling secret extraction and prompt injection. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-68665 (CVSS score: 8.6).

Cybersecurity

It impacts the following npm packages –

  • @langchain/core >= 1.0.0, < 1.1.8 (Fixed in 1.1.8)
  • @langchain/core < 0.3.80 (Fixed in 0.3.80)
  • langchain >= 1.0.0, < 1.2.3 (Fixed in 1.2.3)
  • langchain < 0.3.37 (Fixed in 0.3.37)

In light of the criticality of the vulnerability, users are advised to update to a patched version as soon as possible for optimal protection.

“The most common attack vector is through LLM response fields like additional_kwargs or response_metadata, which can be controlled via prompt injection and then serialized/deserialized in streaming operations,” Porat said. “This is exactly the kind of ‘AI meets classic security’ intersection where organizations get caught off guard. LLM output is an untrusted input.”

Found this article interesting? Follow us on Google News, Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.

“}]] The Hacker News 

Total
0
Shares
Previous Post

ThreatsDay Bulletin: Stealth Loaders, AI Chatbot Flaws AI Exploits, Docker Hack, and 15 More Stories

Next Post

China-Linked Evasive Panda Ran DNS Poisoning Campaign to Deliver MgBot Malware

Related Posts

Secure AI at Scale and Speed — Learn the Framework in this Free Webinar

AI is everywhere—and your company wants in. Faster products, smarter systems, fewer bottlenecks. But if you're in security, that excitement often comes with a sinking feeling. Because while everyone else is racing ahead, you're left trying to manage a growing web of AI agents you didn’t create, can’t fully see, and weren’t designed to control. Join our upcoming webinar and learn how to make AI
Read More

How Attackers Bypass Synced Passkeys

TLDR Even if you take nothing else away from this piece, if your organization is evaluating passkey deployments, it is insecure to deploy synced passkeys. Synced passkeys inherit the risk of the cloud accounts and recovery processes that protect them, which creates material enterprise exposure. Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) kits can force authentication fallbacks that circumvent strong
Read More

React2Shell Exploitation Delivers Crypto Miners and New Malware Across Multiple Sectors

React2Shell continues to witness heavy exploitation, with threat actors leveraging the maximum-severity security flaw in React Server Components (RSC) to deliver cryptocurrency miners and an array of previously undocumented malware families, according to new findings from Huntress. This includes a Linux backdoor called PeerBlight, a reverse proxy tunnel named CowTunnel, and a Go-based
Read More